Analysis of the Common Causes Behind Failed Business Cases

Introduction

Leaders of medium-sized businesses (SMEs) often find it hard to show that their new projects and plans are really worth the money. Even if their ideas sound good at first, many of these business cases do not live up to what they promise. People often blame changes in the market or tough competition. However, the true reasons why these business cases fail are often simpler and come from inside the business itself.

This article brings together the results of several scholarly studies that explain why important plans and the business cases behind them often fail in medium-sized companies. These studies help us understand the common reasons why these efforts fall short.

Methodology

This article is based on ten research papers that look at how medium-sized businesses plan and carry out new projects. Although not all of them use the exact term “business case failure,” they each highlight common problems—like poor alignment with company strategy, unrealistic expectations, weak leadership, lack of good performance measures, and not involving the right people—that often cause projects to fail or fall apart over time.

By looking at these issues together, we can spot patterns that weaken even the most carefully planned business cases.

1. Poor Strategic Alignment and Unrealistic Assumptions

One repeated problem is that new projects don’t fit well with the company’s long-term plans. Even a detailed proposal will struggle if it’s based on unrealistic market ideas or if it doesn’t match the organization’s bigger goals. Research by O’Gorman (2001) and O’Regan, Ghobadian, and Gallear (2006) shows that short-term thinking and poor strategic fit can derail good projects. Skok and Legge (2002) also found that when companies don’t test their assumptions—like those about technology systems—results often fail to meet expectations.

2. Insufficient Performance Management and Metrics

Strong business cases need clear goals, regular progress checks, and a shared idea of what success looks like. Garengo, Biazzo, and Bititci (2005) and Ates, Garengo, Cocca, and Bititci (2013) discovered that many medium-sized businesses don’t have strong systems for measuring success. Without good data, leaders can’t make adjustments in time. Barnes and Hinton (2012) warn that if performance measures don’t match strategy, these metrics turn into empty numbers instead of helpful guides.

3. Leadership Capabilities and Stakeholder Engagement Gaps

Business cases often fail because leaders don’t involve the right people at the right time. If they don’t seek input from a wide group, build support, and encourage open communication, they miss important insights and struggle to gain trust (Blackburn, Hart, & Wainwright, 2013). Gupta, Guo, and Canever (2013) note that cultural differences and local conditions can make this even harder. Ignoring employees, suppliers, and customers reduces the chances of creating a solid, well-informed plan.

4. Poorly Adapted Project Management and Implementation Processes

Project management methods taken from larger companies don’t always fit medium-sized businesses. Turner, Ledwith, and Kelly (2009) show that overly complex systems or tools that don’t suit a company’s size can weaken even the best business case. Dooley and O’Sullivan (2003) add that without a clear, organized approach to managing business cases, mistakes and confusion are more likely, lowering confidence in the project.

5. Weak Cultural and Business Support

A supportive work culture is essential. Without an environment that encourages learning from mistakes and welcomes new ideas, even a strong business case can fail. Skok and Legge (2002) point out that putting in new systems without a culture that supports ongoing improvement leads to poor outcomes. Leaders need to create a place where people constantly learn and improve, or else they risk repeating the same mistakes and weakening future projects.

Implications for Business Leaders

This research suggests that leaders of medium-sized businesses must look beyond basic financial forecasts in developing business cases that deliver long-term benefits. To succeed, they should ensure that new initiatives align with long-term strategic goals, establish clear performance measures, involve stakeholders early and thoroughly, and use project management approaches suitable for their company’s size. Building a culture that learns from past experiences is also essential, allowing future business cases to improve instead of repeating previous mistakes.

Speeding Up the Writing of Business Cases

Another common hurdle is the slow, complicated process of turning ideas and data into a strong, persuasive business case. Under tight deadlines, leaders often rely on outdated templates or patchwork documents, leading to confusion, inconsistency, and weak support—key issues identified in our analysis.

My Business Case Hub® has some very smart AI Tools that solves these problems by rapidly converting the important business case information into professional, well-structured business cases. In minutes, leaders can create business case documents that are aligned with strategy, financially sound, and backed by solid risk assessments. By offering customized templates and integrating financial and risk analysis, these tools ensures no critical element is missed. The result is a credible, transparent business case proposal that can withstand scrutiny and improve the chances of getting approval.

Learn more.

Strategic Alignment and Thorough Options Analysis

Many business cases fail simply because they target the wrong opportunity. The My Business Case Hub® AI Tools helps prevent this by guiding leaders and teams through a careful process of identifying and validating the right opportunities before moving forward.

Rather than rushing ahead, these tools encourages users to explore multiple possible solutions. Its modeling features let leaders assess each option against strategic goals, resource limits, and expected results. By comparing costs, benefits, and risks, they can recommend not only a suitable project, but the one most likely to deliver the best value.

Once the right option is chosen, these tools assists in building a strong, evidence-based business case that’s grounded in thorough research and clear assumptions. This approach reduces the risk of wasting time and money on projects that don’t fit long-term priorities.

Learn more.

Conclusion

Business cases often fail because of internal issues rather than external forces. By recognizing and fixing the common pitfalls uncovered in this meta-analysis—such as poor strategic alignment, weak metrics, limited stakeholder involvement, unsuitable project management, and unsupportive cultures—leaders of medium-sized businesses can avoid these hidden traps. The My Business Case Hub's AI Tools like My Business Case Generator and My Project Plans offer practical solutions, ensuring that proposals are strategically aligned, data-driven, and better positioned to deliver their intended results.

Learn more.

References

• Ates, A., Garengo, P., Cocca, P., & Bititci, U. (2013). The development of SME managerial practice for effective performance management. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(1), 28–54.

• Barnes, D., & Hinton, M. (2012). "Reconceptualising e‐business performance measurement using an innovation adoption framework," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 61(5), pages 502-517, June.

• Blackburn, R. A., Hart, M., & Wainwright, T. (2013). Small business performance: Business, strategy and owner-manager characteristics. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(1), 8–27.

• Dooley, L., & O'Sullivan, D. (2003). Developing a software infrastructure to support systematic innovation through effective management of business cases. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(3), 235–255.

• Garengo, P., Biazzo, S., & Bititci, U. S. (2005). Performance measurement systems in SMEs: A review for a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(1), 25–47.

• Gupta, V. K., Guo, C., & Canever, M. D. (2013). Institutional environment and business failures in emerging economies: A qualitative analysis of medium-sized businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(4), 527–546.

• O’Gorman, C. (2001). The sustainability of growth in small- and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 7(2), 60–75.

• O’Regan, N., Ghobadian, A., & Gallear, D. (2006). In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation, 26(1), 30–41.

• Skok, W., & Legge, M. (2002). Evaluating enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems using an interpretive approach: A case study of a UK manufacturing SME. Information Systems Journal, 12(3), 271–289.

• Turner, J. R., Ledwith, A., & Kelly, J. (2009). Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: Tailoring the practices to the size of the company. Management Decision, 47(5), 732–745.